On 2011-12-04 11:43, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/04/2011 12:33 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Do we have a convention that every include in <> is considered system >> header? Should probably be documented then (and code should be converted >> gradually). > > It's documented in "The C Programming Language", by K&R.
It's just a convention, nothing more. If you consider certain parts of QEMU's API as system (e.g. the parts that may once make our modular API), it makes some sense to use <> for. Right now this happens for some parts of the hw API. But inconsistently. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
