On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Sasha Levin <levinsasha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rusty has just removed it out of the spec. Since we probably the only ones
> who implemented support for it, we should remove it out of our code as well.
>
> There is no issue with breaking anything since nothing else worked with it,
> so it's fully backwards compatible.
>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha...@gmail.com>
Applied, thanks!
How is this going to work going forward? Should I ask Rusty for an ACK
before merging code that implements some (new) part of the virtio
spec? I like the fact that we're bleeding edge but it's pointless for
everyone involved if we implement something that's known to be
half-baked in the spec.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
