On Sun, Nov 13, 2011, Avi Kivity wrote about "Re: [PATCH 02/10] nEPT: MMU context for nested EPT": > On 11/13/2011 01:30 PM, Orit Wasserman wrote: > > Maybe this patch can help, this is roughly what Avi wants (I hope) done > > very quickly. > > I'm sorry I don't have setup to run nested VMX at the moment so i can't > > test it. >... > > +#define PTTYPE EPT > > +#include "paging_tmpl.h" > > +#undef PTTYPE > > Yes, that's the key.
I'm now preparing a patch based on such ideas. One downside of this approach is that mmu.c (and therefore the x86 module) will now include EPT-specific functions that are of no use or relevance to the SVM code. It's not a terrible disaster, but it's "unclean". I'll try to think if there's a cleaner way. Nadav. -- Nadav Har'El | Tuesday, Dec 6 2011, n...@math.technion.ac.il |----------------------------------------- Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |Writing software is like sex: One mistake http://nadav.harel.org.il |and you have to support it forever. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
