On Wed, 07 Dec 2011, Avi Kivity wrote:

> On 12/05/2011 10:19 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > When a host stops or suspends a VM it will set a flag to show this.  The
> > watchdog will use these functions to determine if a softlockup is real, or 
> > the
> > result of a suspended VM.
> >  
> > +bool kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +   bool ret = false;
> > +   struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src;
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * per_cpu() is safe here because this function is only called from
> > +    * timer functions where preemption is already disabled.
> > +    */
> > +   WARN_ON(!in_atomic());
> > +   src = &per_cpu(hv_clock, cpu);
> 
> __get_cpu_var(); drop the cpu argument
> 

Will change for V6.

> > +   if ((src->flags & PVCLOCK_GUEST_STOPPED) != 0) {
> > +           src->flags = src->flags & (~PVCLOCK_GUEST_STOPPED);
> 
> Isn't this racy?  Between reading and writing src->flags, we can exit to
> the hypervisor and add/remove new flags.  The write then overrides those
> new flags.
> 

If I understand (please correct me if this is wrong) because this is only
called from the watchdog, which disables preemption, we should be protected
from something else writing to these flags.

> > +           ret = true;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused);
> > +
> >  static struct clocksource kvm_clock = {
> >     .name = "kvm-clock",
> >     .read = kvm_clock_get_cycles,
> 
> 
> -- 
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to