Hello, Le Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:41:48AM +0100, David Cure ecrivait : > > For kvm_stats, I mean it's better to have only one VM with one > user for the test so I send this evening or tomorrow morning.
I attach snapshot of the kvm_stat : the first one just before to run the function and the second one at the end. Here are the vmstat 1 take when the function is running : 4 0 0 32601320 21360 198776 0 0 49 1123 14577 21601 8 4 88 0 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 4 0 0 32601196 21360 198776 0 0 0 141 16559 21315 12 3 84 0 2 0 0 32601212 21360 198776 0 0 0 128 17377 24949 10 4 86 0 2 0 0 32601128 21360 198776 0 0 0 120 13064 18986 13 3 85 0 4 0 0 32601216 21360 198776 0 0 0 284 16052 21569 11 4 85 0 3 0 0 32601132 21360 198776 0 0 0 192 15846 23323 10 3 87 0 3 0 0 32601492 21360 198776 0 0 0 564 19116 27478 10 4 85 0 4 0 0 32601492 21360 198776 0 0 0 0 16996 24286 14 5 81 0 2 0 0 32601492 21360 198776 0 0 0 661 15754 23371 9 4 87 0 3 0 0 32601268 21360 198776 0 0 36 0 9808 13849 11 1 88 0 2 0 0 32601304 21360 198776 0 0 0 36 11846 13826 14 1 85 0 3 0 0 32601304 21360 198776 0 0 64 37 9445 12263 18 1 81 0 4 0 0 32601604 21360 198776 0 0 290 20 9959 14786 10 2 88 0 I hope you can see something strange ;) David.
<<attachment: kvm_stat1.png>>
<<attachment: kvm_stat2.png>>