Am 05.02.2012 12:16, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 07:29:24PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Keep CPL at 0 in real mode and at 3 in VM86. In protected/long mode, use
>> RPL rather than DPL of the code segment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> index 6a977c1..4124a7e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> @@ -1263,6 +1263,21 @@ static void svm_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> wrmsrl(host_save_user_msrs[i], svm->host_user_msrs[i]);
>> }
>>
>> +static void svm_update_cpl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>> + int cpl;
>> +
>> + if (!is_protmode(vcpu))
>> + cpl = 0;
>> + else if (svm->vmcb->save.rflags & X86_EFLAGS_VM)
>> + cpl = 3;
>> + else
>> + cpl = svm->vmcb->save.cs.selector & 0x3;
>> +
>> + svm->vmcb->save.cpl = cpl;
>> +}
>> +
> As you probably know already I think cpl should be updated in
> svm_get_rflags() too. With current patch restoring CS segment
> register before rflags register after migration may cause cpl
> to get wrong value for instance.
I think you mean set_rflags rather than get_rflags?
Patch 4 adds this with the set_rflags emulator callback.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
