On 02/09/2012 05:23 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > How about we return 1 for kvm_arch_vcpu_in_guest_mode() on !x86 > always, just like it's done today basically? Then we can worry about > needless IPIs later and don't regress from the respective current > kick implementations.
And perhaps call the function kvm_arch_vcpu_maybe_in_guest_mode() to avoid confusion. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
