-----Original Message-----
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> 
> Il 22/03/2012 01:23, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto:
> > Actually, I also see some failures during testing. And most of them
> > are fail to pass the 244us update cycle checking. Since we are in
> > emulation environment, we cannot ensure it always greater than 244us.
> > So I think it should not be a bug.
> 
> Yes, that's fine.  But I also see some cases in which the first upgrade
> cycle after divider reset is not reported.  The second, 1.5 seconds
> after divider reset, is fine.
I think your patch can fix it. Right?

Best regards
yang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to