On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:25:30 +0300
Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -1689,7 +1690,7 @@ static void mmu_sync_children(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > >
> > > kvm_mmu_pages_init(parent, &parents, &pages);
> > > while (mmu_unsync_walk(parent, &pages)) {
> > > - int protected = 0;
> > > + bool protected = false;
> > >
> > > for_each_sp(pages, sp, parents, i)
> > > protected |= rmap_write_protect(vcpu->kvm, sp->gfn);
> >
> > Isn't this the reason we prefer int to bool?
> >
> > Not sure people like to use |= with boolean.
> >
>
> Why not?
>
The code "bitwise OR assignment" is assuming the internal representations
of true and false: true=1, false=0.
I might have seen some point if it had been
protected = protected || rmap_...
But the real question is whether there is any point in re-writing completely
correct C code: there are tons of int like this in the kernel code.
__rmap_write_protect() was introduced recently, so if this conversion is
really worthwhile, I should have been told to use bool at that time, no?
Thanks,
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
