On 04/21/2012 05:39 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

>> @@ -1177,9 +1178,8 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned 
>> long *rmapp,
>>                      new_spte = *sptep & ~PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK;
>>                      new_spte |= (u64)new_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>
>> -                    new_spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
>> -                    new_spte &= ~SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
>> -                    new_spte &= ~shadow_accessed_mask;
>> +                    new_spte &= ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE |
>> +                                  shadow_accessed_mask | SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE);
> 
> Each bit should have a distinct meaning. Here the host pte is being
> write-protected, which means only the SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE bit
> should be cleared.


Hmm, it is no problem if SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE is not cleared.

But the meaning of SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE will become strange: we will see a
spte with spte.SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE = 1 (means the spte is writable on host
and guest) and spte.SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE = 0 (means the spte is read-only
on host).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to