On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 02:06:29PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> The patch introduces a bitmap that will hold reasons apic should be
> checked during vmexit. This is in a preparation for vp eoi patch
> that will add one more check on vmexit. With the bitmap we can do
> if(apic_attention) to check everything simultaneously which will
> add zero overhead on the fast path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index f624ca7..69e39bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ enum {
> #define DR7_FIXED_1 0x00000400
> #define DR7_VOLATILE 0xffff23ff
>
> +/* apic attention bits */
> +#define KVM_APIC_CHECK_VAPIC 0
> +
> /*
> * We don't want allocation failures within the mmu code, so we preallocate
> * enough memory for a single page fault in a cache.
> @@ -337,6 +340,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> u64 efer;
> u64 apic_base;
> struct kvm_lapic *apic; /* kernel irqchip context */
> + unsigned long apic_attention;
> int32_t apic_arb_prio;
> int mp_state;
> int sipi_vector;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 992b4ea..93c1574 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1088,6 +1088,7 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> apic_update_ppr(apic);
>
> vcpu->arch.apic_arb_prio = 0;
> + vcpu->arch.apic_attention = 0;
>
> apic_debug(KERN_INFO "%s: vcpu=%p, id=%d, base_msr="
> "0x%016" PRIx64 ", base_address=0x%0lx.\n", __func__,
> @@ -1287,7 +1288,7 @@ void kvm_lapic_sync_from_vapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> u32 data;
> void *vapic;
>
> - if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) || !vcpu->arch.apic->vapic_addr)
> + if (!test_bit(KVM_APIC_CHECK_VAPIC, &vcpu->arch.apic_attention))
> return;
>
> vapic = kmap_atomic(vcpu->arch.apic->vapic_page);
> @@ -1304,7 +1305,7 @@ void kvm_lapic_sync_to_vapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct kvm_lapic *apic;
> void *vapic;
>
> - if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) || !vcpu->arch.apic->vapic_addr)
> + if (!test_bit(KVM_APIC_CHECK_VAPIC, &vcpu->arch.apic_attention))
> return;
>
> apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
I just noticed that this uses atomic test_bit.
Probably unintentional. Let's change that to __test_bit before
it's too late.
> @@ -1324,10 +1325,11 @@ void kvm_lapic_sync_to_vapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> void kvm_lapic_set_vapic_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t vapic_addr)
> {
> - if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))
> - return;
> -
> vcpu->arch.apic->vapic_addr = vapic_addr;
> + if (vapic_addr)
> + __set_bit(KVM_APIC_CHECK_VAPIC, &vcpu->arch.apic_attention);
> + else
> + __clear_bit(KVM_APIC_CHECK_VAPIC, &vcpu->arch.apic_attention);
> }
>
> int kvm_x2apic_msr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)
> --
> 1.7.7.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
