On 05/24/2012 12:24 PM, Ren, Yongjie wrote: > Hi Avi, > Our team spare some effort in regular nightly testing against KVM upstream. > We're using master branch now and all the test reports I sent out are based > on master branch. > Which branch of kvm.git should we do regular testing against? > Your suggestion?
kvm.git next. In theory kvm.git auto-next is even better, but we sometimes forget to update it. > > I know next branch contains latest KVM patches. > But I found some recent KVM patches in master branch never existed in next > branch. > And, the next branch is based on linux3.4-rc3, while master branch is based > on linux3.4-rc7. 'master' contains fixes, 'next' contains updates queued for the merge window. 'auto-next' should contain both, plus the latest upstream. > Another question is whether the patches in next branch will be finally merged > into master branch? > During the merge window. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
