On 06/01/2012 01:20 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> At the moment we call kvmppc_pin_guest_page() in kvmppc_update_vpa()
> with two spinlocks held: the vcore lock and the vcpu->vpa_update_lock.
> This is not good, since kvmppc_pin_guest_page() calls down_read() and
> get_user_pages_fast(), both of which can sleep. This bug was introduced
> in 2e25aa5f ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Make virtual processor area
> registration more robust").
>
> This arranges to drop those spinlocks before calling
> kvmppc_pin_guest_page() and re-take them afterwards. Dropping the
> vcore lock in kvmppc_run_core() means we have to set the vcore_state
> field to VCORE_RUNNING before we drop the lock, so that other vcpus
> won't try to run this vcore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
> ---
> Since this bug is in Linus' tree, and it can cause a scheduling while
> atomic bug message, can we send this to Linus for inclusion in 3.5,
> after review of course?
>
Sure, Alex?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
