On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:34:31AM +0800, Guo Chao wrote:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guo Chao <y...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index f48cef3..7593693 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -5880,7 +5880,7 @@ static int vmx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>               return handle_invalid_guest_state(vcpu);
>  
>       /*
> -      * the KVM_REQ_EVENT optimization bit is only on for one entry, and if
> +      * The KVM_REQ_EVENT optimization bit is only on for one entry, and if
>        * we did not inject a still-pending event to L1 now because of
>        * nested_run_pending, we need to re-enable this bit.
>        */

There is no rule about comments in code starting with uppercase.

Patches to correct spelling would be accepted.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to