Il 04/07/2012 14:50, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> Before merging the patches (or actually this patch, I think patch 1 is
> fairly independent),

Yes, it is.

> I'd like to hear more opinions on whether we need
> the cache parameter split first

Ok, let's discuss it next week on the KVM/QEMU call.  Getting the cache
parameter split before 1.2 is going to be hard, but who knows.

> But as far as the hardware is
> concerned, sure, take it as an Acked-by and go forward with the spec and
> kernel side of things.

Rusty already committed everything, so it's too late! :)  (Sorry for the
tabs vs. spaces BTW).

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to