On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:08:20AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 11:32 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2012-06-11 13:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > We can deliver certain interrupts, notably MSIX,
> > > from atomic context.
> > > Here's an untested patch to do this (compiled only).
> > >
> > > Changes from v2:
> > > Don't inject broadcast interrupts directly
> > > Changes from v1:
> > > Tried to address comments from v1, except unifying
> > > with kvm_set_irq: passing flags to it looks too ugly.
> > > Added a comment.
> > >
> > > Jan, you said you can test this?
> > >
> > >
> > > Michael S. Tsirkin (2):
> > > kvm: implement kvm_set_msi_inatomic
> > > kvm: deliver msix interrupts from irq handler
> > >
> > > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 ++
> > > virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > > virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 75
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > Finally-tested-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
>
> Michael, we need either this or the simple oneshot patch to get device
> assignment working again for 3.5. Are you planning to push this for
> 3.5? Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
Avi wants this reworked using an injection cache. I agree with Jan
though: oneshot looks too ugly. Just so you can make progress, can't we
add a stub handler returning IRQ_WAKE_THREAD unconditionally for now?
I.e. like the below (warning: completely untested).
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
--
diff --git a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
index b1e091a..18cc36e 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
@@ -334,6 +334,11 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_intx(struct kvm
*kvm,
}
#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_MSI
+static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_msi(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
+}
+
static int assigned_device_enable_host_msi(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev)
{
@@ -346,7 +351,7 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_msi(struct kvm *kvm,
}
dev->host_irq = dev->dev->irq;
- if (request_threaded_irq(dev->host_irq, NULL,
+ if (request_threaded_irq(dev->host_irq, kvm_assigned_dev_msi,
kvm_assigned_dev_thread_msi, 0,
dev->irq_name, dev)) {
pci_disable_msi(dev->dev);
@@ -358,6 +363,11 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_msi(struct kvm *kvm,
#endif
#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_MSIX
+static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_msix(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
+}
+
static int assigned_device_enable_host_msix(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev)
{
@@ -374,7 +384,8 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_msix(struct kvm *kvm,
for (i = 0; i < dev->entries_nr; i++) {
r = request_threaded_irq(dev->host_msix_entries[i].vector,
- NULL, kvm_assigned_dev_thread_msix,
+ kvm_assigned_dev_msix,
+ kvm_assigned_dev_thread_msix,
0, dev->irq_name, dev);
if (r)
goto err;
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
