On 07/12/2012 08:11 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> Ah, I thouht you objected to the CONFIG var. Maybe call it >> cpu_relax_intercepted since that's the linuxy name for the instruction. >> > > Ok, just to be on same page. 'll have : > 1. cpu_relax_intercepted instead of pause_loop_exited. > > 2. CONFIG_KVM_HAVE_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT which is unconditionally > selected for x86 and s390 > > 3. make request mechanism to clear cpu_relax_intercepted. > > ('ll do same thing for s390 also but have not seen s390 code using > request mechanism, so not sure if it ok.. otherwise we have to clear > unconditionally for s390 before guest enter and for x86 we have to move > make_request back to vmx/svm). > will post V3 with these changes.
You can leave the s390 changes to the s390 people; just make sure the generic code is ready. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html