On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > We already discussed to let the irq chip (in this case MSI) tell the
> > core that it does not need the extra oneshot handling. That way the
> > code which requests an threaded irq with the NULL primary handler
> > works on both MSI and normal interrupts.
>
> So I don't think your patch is quite right.
>
> If you want to clear the IRQF_ONESHOT for MSI irq's (and other ones
> where the interrupt controller is fundamentally ONESHOT), I think you
> should do it a few lines higher up - *before* you check the "does the
> IRQF_ONESHOT mask match other shared interrupts"?
>
> Now, irq sharing presumably doesn't happen with MSI, but there's
> nothing fundamentally wrong with message-based irq schemes that have
> shared interrupt handlers.
>
> I think. Hmm?
Shared irqs are not supported by MSI, but yes, the check should be
done way up. Makes it less ugly as well :)
Thanks,
tglx
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -3109,6 +3109,7 @@ static struct irq_chip msi_chip = {
.irq_set_affinity = msi_set_affinity,
#endif
.irq_retrigger = ioapic_retrigger_irq,
+ .flags = IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE,
};
static int setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc, int
irq)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/irq.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/irq.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ enum {
IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND = (1 << 2),
IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED = (1 << 3),
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE = (1 << 4),
+ IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE = (1 << 5),
};
/* This include will go away once we isolated irq_desc usage to core code */
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/manage.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -960,6 +960,18 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq
}
/*
+ * Drivers are often written to work w/o knowledge about the
+ * underlying irq chip implementation, so a request for a
+ * threaded irq without a primary hard irq context handler
+ * requires the ONESHOT flag to be set. Some irq chips like
+ * MSI based interrupts are per se one shot safe. Check the
+ * chip flags, so we can avoid the unmask dance at the end of
+ * the threaded handler for those.
+ */
+ if (desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE)
+ new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT;
+
+ /*
* The following block of code has to be executed atomically
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
@@ -1033,7 +1045,8 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq
*/
new->thread_mask = 1 << ffz(thread_mask);
- } else if (new->handler == irq_default_primary_handler) {
+ } else if (new->handler == irq_default_primary_handler &&
+ !(desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE)) {
/*
* The interrupt was requested with handler = NULL, so
* we use the default primary handler for it. But it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
