On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 11:02 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-08-01 20:09, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:13 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-08-01 07:18, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > 
> >>> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 14)
> >>> +
> >>> +#endif /* VFIO_H */
> >>>
> >>
> >> Please patch update-linux-headers.sh and let it do its work instead
> >> (separate patches).
> > 
> > Unfortunately I missed updating the Kbuild file in the kernel, so vfio.h
> > doesn't get installed yet.  I'll include that in my next pull request,
> > but maybe in the meantime I should temporarily put this header back in
> > hw/ unless you have a better idea.  Thanks,
> 
> Well, if it's going to be fixed very soon, we can merge it like this.
> But you should already be able provide a patch for the update script so
> that the next one running it against a fixed kernel will not
> accidentally drop the vfio header again.

What's the reason for the rm -fr; mkdir -p in the update script?  I
don't see how we'd be unintentionally generating cruft in these
directories if we were to just overwrite files instead of removing the
directory and repopulating it.  I'll get the kernel fixed soon, but I'm
tempted to add vfio and drop the expunge of the directory at the same
time.  Thanks,

Alex



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to