Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
> Il 02/07/2012 02:29, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>> VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST
>> implies you should tell the host (eventually).  I don't know if any
>> implementations actually care though.
>
> This is indeed broken, because it is a "negative" feature: it tells you
> that "implicit deflate" is _not_ supported.
>
> Right now, QEMU refuses migration if the target does not support all the
> features that were negotiated.  But then:
>
> - a migration from non-MUST_TELL_HOST to MUST_TELL_HOST will succeed,
> which is wrong;
>
> - a migration from MUST_TELL_HOST to non-MUST_TELL_HOST will fail, which
> is useless.
>
>> We could add a VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_NEVER_TELL_DEFLATE which would mean the
>> deflate vq need not be used at all.
>
> That would work.  At the same time we could deprecate MUST_TELL_HOST.
> Certainly the guest implementations don't care, or we would have
> experienced problems such as the one above.  The QEMU implementation
> also does not care but, for example, a Xen implementation would care.

OK; I'm not sure we need to deprecate MUST_TELL_HOST, though since it's
never actually been used there's a good argument.

VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SILENT_DEFLATE (or whatever it's called) would
obviously mean you couldn't ack VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST.

Patches welcome!

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to