On 18 September 2012 13:47, Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 04:34:43PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> +#define L_PTE2_SHARED                L_PTE_SHARED
>> +#define L_PTE2_READ          (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 6) /* HAP[0] */
>> +#define L_PTE2_WRITE         (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 7) /* HAP[1] */
>
> This is actually HAP[2:1], not HAP[1:0]. Also, can you follow what we do for
> stage 1 translation and name these RDONLY and WRONLY (do you even use
> that?).

We can't use RDONLY as this would have value 0 as the HAP attributes
(stage 2 overriding stage 1 translation attributes). Unless you add 4
definitions like NOACCESS, RDONLY, WRONLY and RDWR to cover all the
bit combinations.

>> +#define L_PTE2_NORM_WB               (_AT(pteval_t, 3) << 4) /* 
>> MemAttr[3:2] */
>> +#define L_PTE2_INNER_WB              (_AT(pteval_t, 3) << 2) /* 
>> MemAttr[1:0] */
>
> Another minor nit: PTE2 looks awful. Maybe L_PTE_HYP_* instead?

L_PTE_HYP may be confused with the Stage 1 Hyp translation which is
different from the guest Stage 2.

But I have another minor nit - just write them in the ascending bit
order as other definitions in this file.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to