On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:39:36PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> struct kvm_memory_slot is currently 52 bytes (LP64), not counting the
> arch data. On x86 this means the memslot array to support a tiny 32+3
> entries (user+private) is over 2k. We'd like to support more slots
> so that we can support more assigned devices, but it doesn't make
> sense to penalize everyone by using a statically allocated array.
> This allows us to start introducing a grow-able array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 +++-
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 9 ++++++---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 10 ++++++----
> 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
> index 012e5dd..96401b5 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
> @@ -1836,7 +1836,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
>
> memslot = id_to_memslot(kvm->memslots, log->slot);
> r = -ENOENT;
> - if (!memslot->dirty_bitmap)
> + if (!memslots || !memslot->dirty_bitmap)
> goto out;
>
> kvm_ia64_sync_dirty_log(kvm, memslot);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 56067db..0417190 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> kvm_dirty_log *log)
>
> memslot = id_to_memslot(kvm->memslots, log->slot);
> r = -ENOENT;
> - if (!memslot->dirty_bitmap)
> + if (!memslot || !memslot->dirty_bitmap)
> goto out;
>
> n = kvm_dirty_bitmap_bytes(memslot);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 2bb9157..07fdd90 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -2751,6 +2751,7 @@ static gva_t rmode_tss_base(struct kvm *kvm)
>
> slots = kvm_memslots(kvm);
> slot = id_to_memslot(slots, KVM_PRIVATE_MEM_SLOTS);
> + BUG_ON(!slot);
> base_gfn = slot->base_gfn + slot->npages - 3;
>
> return base_gfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 8765485..53fe9b2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -3139,9 +3139,11 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> kvm_dirty_log *log)
> goto out;
>
> memslot = id_to_memslot(kvm->memslots, log->slot);
> + r = -ENOENT;
> + if (!memslot)
> + goto out;
>
> dirty_bitmap = memslot->dirty_bitmap;
> - r = -ENOENT;
> if (!dirty_bitmap)
> goto out;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 7b3d5c4..1955a4e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ struct kvm_irq_routing_table {};
> * to get the memslot by its id.
> */
> struct kvm_memslots {
> + int nmemslots;
> u64 generation;
> struct kvm_memory_slot memslots[KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM];
> };
> @@ -397,7 +398,7 @@ static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu(struct kvm
> *kvm, int i)
>
> #define kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, slots) \
> for (memslot = &slots->memslots[0]; \
> - memslot < slots->memslots + KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM && memslot->npages;\
> + memslot < slots->memslots + slots->nmemslots && memslot->npages;\
> memslot++)
>
> int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id);
> @@ -424,10 +425,12 @@ static inline struct kvm_memslots *kvm_memslots(struct
> kvm *kvm)
> static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
> id_to_memslot(struct kvm_memslots *slots, int id)
> {
> - int index = slots->memslots[id].id_to_index;
> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
>
> - slot = &slots->memslots[index];
> + if (id >= slots->nmemslots)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + slot = &slots->memslots[slots->memslots[id].id_to_index];
>
> WARN_ON(slot->id != id);
> return slot;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 3ce2664..ebd3960 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -444,7 +444,9 @@ static void kvm_init_memslots_id(struct kvm *kvm)
> int i;
> struct kvm_memslots *slots = kvm->memslots;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM; i++)
> + slots->nmemslots = KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < kvm->memslots->nmemslots; i++)
> slots->memslots[i].id_to_index = slots->memslots[i].id = i;
> }
>
> @@ -658,10 +660,10 @@ static void sort_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots)
> {
> int i;
>
> - sort(slots->memslots, KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM,
> + sort(slots->memslots, slots->nmemslots,
> sizeof(struct kvm_memory_slot), cmp_memslot, NULL);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < slots->nmemslots; i++)
> slots->memslots[slots->memslots[i].id].id_to_index = i;
> }
>
> @@ -898,7 +900,7 @@ int kvm_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
>
> memslot = id_to_memslot(kvm->memslots, log->slot);
> r = -ENOENT;
> - if (!memslot->dirty_bitmap)
> + if (!memslot || !memslot->dirty_bitmap)
> goto out;
>
> n = kvm_dirty_bitmap_bytes(memslot);
I suppose this should be checked earlier, not at id_to_memslot time.
eg for kvm_get_dirty_log at
r = -EINVAL;
if (log->slot >= KVM_MEMORY_SLOTS)
goto out;
time
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
