On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:13:03PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> We have two issues in current code:
> - if target gfn is used as its page table, guest will refault then kvm will
> use
> small page size to map it. We need two #PF to fix its shadow page table
>
> - sometimes, say a exception is triggered during vm-exit caused by #PF
> (see handle_exception() in vmx.c), we remove all the shadow pages shadowed
> by the target gfn before go into page fault path, it will cause infinite
> loop:
> delete shadow pages shadowed by the gfn -> try to use large page size to map
> the gfn -> retry the access ->...
>
> To fix these, We can adjust page size early if the target gfn is used as page
> table
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 13 ++++---------
> arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 2a3c890..54fc61e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2380,15 +2380,10 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) {
>
> /*
> - * There are two cases:
> - * - the one is other vcpu creates new sp in the window
> - * between mapping_level() and acquiring mmu-lock.
> - * - the another case is the new sp is created by itself
> - * (page-fault path) when guest uses the target gfn as
> - * its page table.
> - * Both of these cases can be fixed by allowing guest to
> - * retry the access, it will refault, then we can establish
> - * the mapping by using small page.
> + * Other vcpu creates new sp in the window between
> + * mapping_level() and acquiring mmu-lock. We can
> + * allow guest to retry the access, the mapping can
> + * be fixed if guest refault.
> */
> if (level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL &&
> has_wrprotected_page(vcpu->kvm, gfn, level))
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> index ec481e9..32d77ff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> @@ -491,6 +491,36 @@ out_gpte_changed:
> return 0;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * To see whether the mapped gfn can write its page table in the current
> + * mapping.
> + *
> + * It is the helper function of FNAME(page_fault). When guest uses large page
> + * size to map the writable gfn which is used as current page table, we
> should
> + * force kvm to use small page size to map it because new shadow page will be
> + * created when kvm establishes shadow page table that stop kvm using large
> + * page size. Do it early can avoid unnecessary #PF and emulation.
> + *
> + * Note: the PDPT page table is not checked for PAE-32 bit guest. It is ok
> + * since the PDPT is always shadowed, that means, we can not use large page
> + * size to map the gfn which is used as PDPT.
> + */
> +static bool
> +FNAME(mapped_gfn_can_write_current_pagetable)(struct guest_walker *walker)
> +{
> + int level;
> + gfn_t mask = ~(KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(walker->level) - 1);
> +
> + if (!(walker->pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK))
> + return false;
> +
> + for (level = walker->level; level <= walker->max_level; level++)
> + if (!((walker->gfn ^ walker->table_gfn[level - 1]) & mask))
> + return true;
XOR won't work. Just check with sums and integer comparison, ie.
walker->gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(walker->level).
Moreover, its confusing to have it checked at this level. What about
doing at reexecute_instruction?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
