On 01/11/2013 09:42:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.01.2013, at 02:10, Scott Wood wrote:
> struct kvm_device_attr {
> __u32 device;
This needs some semantic specification. Is device a constant value?
Is it the return value of CREATE_IRQCHIP?
As proposed, it's up to the architecture to provide that
specification. In theory this could be used for things other than IRQ
chips. We could still say that device creation functions return a
valid device ID (if the device has any attributes), as well as have
other architecture-specific ways of describing device IDs (static
enumeration). Or we could have non-architecture-specific static
enumeration. Or just require that all devices be explicitly created by
something that returns the ID.
Do you have a preferred approach?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
