On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:06:43AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 01/28/2013 06:59 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:28:40AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >> On 01/25/2013 09:17 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:03:57 -0700
> >>> Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> A couple patches to make KVM IOMMU support honor read-only mappings.
> >>>> This causes an un-map, re-map when the read-only flag changes and
> >>>> makes use of it when setting IOMMU attributes. Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Looks good to me.
> >>>
> >>> I think I can naturally update my patch after this gets merged.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Please wait.
> >>
> >> The commit c972f3b1 changed the write-protect behaviour - it does
> >> wirte-protection only when dirty flag is set.
> >> [ I did not see this commit when we discussed the problem before. ]
> >>
> >> Further more, i notice that write-protect is not enough, when do sync
> >> shadow page:
> >>
> >> FNAME(sync_page):
> >>
> >> host_writable = sp->spt[i] & SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
> >>
> >> set_spte(vcpu, &sp->spt[i], pte_access,
> >> PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, gfn,
> >> spte_to_pfn(sp->spt[i]), true, false,
> >> host_writable);
> >>
> >> It sets spte based on the old value that means the readonly flag check
> >> is missed. We need to call kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all under this case.
> > Why not just disallow changing memory region KVM_MEM_READONLY flag
> > without deleting the region?
>
> It will introduce some restriction when VM-sharing-mem is being implemented,
> but we need to do some optimization for it, at least, properly write-protect
> readonly pages (fix sync_page()) instead of zap_all_page.
>
What is VM-sharing-mem?
> So, i guess we can do the simple fix first.
>
By simple fix you mean calling kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() on READONLY
flag change?
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
