It's possible that we're using the same host TLB1 slot to map (a
presumably different portion of) the same guest TLB1 entry. Clear
the bit in the map before setting it, so that if the esels are the same
the bit will remain set.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
index 35fb80e..8e72b21 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
@@ -507,13 +507,14 @@ static int kvmppc_e500_tlb1_map_tlb1(struct
kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *vcpu_e500,
if (unlikely(vcpu_e500->host_tlb1_nv >= tlb1_max_shadow_size()))
vcpu_e500->host_tlb1_nv = 0;
- vcpu_e500->tlb_refs[1][sesel] = *ref;
- vcpu_e500->g2h_tlb1_map[esel] |= (u64)1 << sesel;
- vcpu_e500->gtlb_priv[1][esel].ref.flags |= E500_TLB_BITMAP;
if (vcpu_e500->h2g_tlb1_rmap[sesel]) {
unsigned int idx = vcpu_e500->h2g_tlb1_rmap[sesel] - 1;
vcpu_e500->g2h_tlb1_map[idx] &= ~(1ULL << sesel);
}
+
+ vcpu_e500->tlb_refs[1][sesel] = *ref;
+ vcpu_e500->gtlb_priv[1][esel].ref.flags |= E500_TLB_BITMAP;
+ vcpu_e500->g2h_tlb1_map[esel] |= (u64)1 << sesel;
vcpu_e500->h2g_tlb1_rmap[sesel] = esel + 1;
return sesel;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
