On 12.04.2013, at 22:54, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:50:13PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> On 11.04.2013, at 15:45, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:59:04PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: >>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:33:12AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:35:09AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>>>> I agree. So if it doesn't hurt to have the same commits in kvm/next and >>>>>> kvm/master, I'd be more than happy to send another pull request with the >>>>>> important fixes against kvm/master as well. >>>>>> >>>>> If it will result in the same commit showing twice in the Linus tree in >>>>> 3.10 we cannot do that. >>>> >>>> Why not? In the circumstances it seems perfectly reasonable to me. >>>> Git should merge the branches without any problem, and even if it >>>> doesn't, Linus is good at fixing merge conflicts. >>>> >>>> Paul. >>> >>> Yes, should avoid duplicate commits but its not fatal for them to exist. >> >> So I may send a pull request against 3.9 with the 3 commits that already are >> in kvm/next? > > If you decide that the fixes are important enough to justify the > existance of duplicate commits, i don't see a problem.
Great :). I already sent the pull request out with all patches that fix regressions. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
