That is what I mean yes...

Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote:

>On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:36:29AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Just to interject here... all this is about host kernel vs userspace,
>> correct? I.e. nothing that affects the guest. I assume that the guest
>> sees CPUID and that is what is supported.
>
>Actually, currently the guest sees MOVBE in CPUID set:
>
>max base function: 0x00000005
>CPUID.EAX=0x00000000
>EAX=0x00000005, EBX=0x68747541, ECX=0x444d4163, EDX=0x69746e65
>CPUID.EAX=0x00000001
>EAX=0x000106c2, EBX=0x01000800, ECX=0x80400201, EDX=0x0789fbff
>                                       ^
>                                       |- bit 22
>
>even though host (AMD) doesn't support it.
>
>And I'd say we want it that way because the guest should show it in
>CPUID so that not only the guest kernel but also guest userspace
>binaries built with MOVBE can be run.

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to