On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:14:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 02:00:41PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
> > 
> > Since the arrival of posted interrupt support we can no longer guarantee
> > that coalesced IRQs are always reported to the IRQ source. Moreover,
> > accumulated APIC timer events could cause a busy loop when a VCPU should
> > rather be halted. The consensus is to remove coalesced tracking from the
> > LAPIC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> >  - preserve return values where we need to count to how many VCPUs an
> >    IRQ was delivered
> 
> It would be best to confirm first that no guest depends on LAPIC timer
> reinjection (rather than wait for guests to break and spend time
> debugging). Specially since such kind of bugs are not easy to pinpoint.
> Or if there is evidence to invalidate such reasoning, please point it
> out.
> 
> Honestly i don't recall: would have to check RHEL5.32 UP/SMP, RHEL5.64
> UP/SMP, RHEL4.32, RHEL4.64, RHEL6. Can do that in a week or so.

Its OK to remove LAPIC timer reinjection.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to