On 05/19/2013 12:52 PM, Jun Nakajima wrote:
> From: Nadav Har'El <n...@il.ibm.com>
>
> Since link_shadow_page() is used by a routine in mmu.c, add an
> EPT-specific link_shadow_page() in paging_tmp.h, rather than moving
> it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <n...@il.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakaj...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xinhao Xu <xinhao...@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> index 4c45654..dc495f9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> @@ -461,6 +461,18 @@ static void FNAME(pte_prefetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct guest_walker *gw,
> }
> }
>
> +#if PTTYPE == PTTYPE_EPT
> +static void FNAME(link_shadow_page)(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> +{
> + u64 spte;
> +
> + spte = __pa(sp->spt) | VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK | VMX_EPT_WRITABLE_MASK |
> + VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK;
> +
> + mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
> +}
> +#endif
The only difference between this function and the current link_shadow_page()
is shadow_accessed_mask. Can we add a parameter to eliminate this difference,
some like:
static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, bool accessed)
{
u64 spte;
spte = __pa(sp->spt) | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK |
shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask;
if (accessed)
spte |= shadow_accessed_mask;
mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
}
?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
