Il 28/06/2013 04:57, Marcelo Tosatti ha scritto:
> 
> One possibility for a softlockup report in a Linux VM, is that the host
> system is overcommitted to the point where the watchdog task is unable
> to make progress (unable to touch the watchdog).
> 
> Maintain the increment in stolen time for the period of 
> softlockup threshold detection (20 seconds by the default), 
> and report this increment in the softlockup message.
> 
> Overcommitment is then indicated by a large stolen time increment,
> accounting for more than, or for a significant percentage of the
> softlockup threshold.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index 05039e3..ed09d58 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ int __read_mostly watchdog_thresh = 10;
>  static int __read_mostly watchdog_disabled;
>  static u64 __read_mostly sample_period;
>  
> +#define SOFT_INTRS_PER_PERIOD 5
> +
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, watchdog_touch_ts);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, softlockup_watchdog);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer, watchdog_hrtimer);
> @@ -127,9 +129,51 @@ static void set_sample_period(void)
>        * and hard thresholds) to increment before the
>        * hardlockup detector generates a warning
>        */
> -     sample_period = get_softlockup_thresh() * ((u64)NSEC_PER_SEC / 5);
> +     sample_period = get_softlockup_thresh() *
> +                     ((u64)NSEC_PER_SEC / SOFT_INTRS_PER_PERIOD);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> +struct steal_clock_record {
> +     u64 prev_stolen_time;
> +     u64 stolen_time[SOFT_INTRS_PER_PERIOD];
> +     int idx;
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct steal_clock_record, steal_record);
> +static void record_steal_time(void)
> +{
> +     struct steal_clock_record *r;
> +     int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +     u64 steal_time;
> +     r = &per_cpu(steal_record, cpu);
> +
> +     steal_time = paravirt_steal_clock(cpu);
> +     r->stolen_time[r->idx] = steal_time - r->prev_stolen_time;
> +     r->idx++;
> +     if (r->idx == SOFT_INTRS_PER_PERIOD)
> +             r->idx = 0;
> +     r->prev_stolen_time = steal_time;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int get_accumulated_steal(int cpu)
> +{
> +     int idx;
> +     u64 t = 0;
> +     struct steal_clock_record *r = &per_cpu(steal_record, cpu);
> +
> +     for (idx = 0; idx < SOFT_INTRS_PER_PERIOD; idx++)
> +             t += r->stolen_time[idx];
> +
> +     do_div(t, 1000000);
> +
> +     return t;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +static void record_steal_time(void) { return; }
> +#endif
> +
>  /* Commands for resetting the watchdog */
>  static void __touch_watchdog(void)
>  {
> @@ -271,6 +315,9 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct 
> hrtimer *hrtimer)
>       /* kick the hardlockup detector */
>       watchdog_interrupt_count();
>  
> +     /* record steal time */
> +     record_steal_time();
> +
>       /* kick the softlockup detector */
>       wake_up_process(__this_cpu_read(softlockup_watchdog));
>  
> @@ -316,6 +363,10 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct 
> hrtimer *hrtimer)
>               printk(KERN_EMERG "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#%d stuck for %us! 
> [%s:%d]\n",
>                       smp_processor_id(), duration,
>                       current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> +             printk(KERN_EMERG "soft lockup stolen time = %ums\n",
> +                     get_accumulated_steal(smp_processor_id()));

Perhaps print this only if nonzero (so that it doesn't print it on bare
metal)?  Then you can remove the #ifdef too, it will be optimized away
by the compiler for !CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING.

Paolo

> +#endif
>               print_modules();
>               print_irqtrace_events(current);
>               if (regs)
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to