Il 30/07/2013 15:02, Xiao Guangrong ha scritto:
> kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log() write-protects the spte based on the dirty
> bitmap, we should ensure the writable spte can be found in rmap before the
> dirty bitmap is visible. Otherwise, we cleared the dirty bitmap and failed
> to write-protect the page
> 
> It need the memory barrier to prevent out-of-order that will be added in the
> later patch

Do you mean that the later patch will also introduce a memory barrier?

Paolo

> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 0fe56ad..58283bf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2425,6 +2425,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
>  {
>       u64 spte;
>       int ret = 0;
> +     bool remap = is_rmap_spte(*sptep);
>  
>       if (set_mmio_spte(vcpu->kvm, sptep, gfn, pfn, pte_access))
>               return 0;
> @@ -2490,6 +2491,14 @@ set_pte:
>       if (mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte))
>               kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
>  
> +     if (!remap) {
> +             if (rmap_add(vcpu, sptep, gfn) > RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD)
> +                     rmap_recycle(vcpu, sptep, gfn);
> +
> +             if (level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
> +                     ++vcpu->kvm->stat.lpages;
> +     }
> +
>       if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK)
>               mark_page_dirty(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
>  done:
> @@ -2501,9 +2510,6 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 
> *sptep,
>                        int level, gfn_t gfn, pfn_t pfn, bool speculative,
>                        bool host_writable)
>  {
> -     int was_rmapped = 0;
> -     int rmap_count;
> -
>       pgprintk("%s: spte %llx write_fault %d gfn %llx\n", __func__,
>                *sptep, write_fault, gfn);
>  
> @@ -2525,8 +2531,7 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 
> *sptep,
>                                spte_to_pfn(*sptep), pfn);
>                       drop_spte(vcpu->kvm, sptep);
>                       kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
> -             } else
> -                     was_rmapped = 1;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       if (set_spte(vcpu, sptep, pte_access, level, gfn, pfn, speculative,
> @@ -2544,16 +2549,6 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 
> *sptep,
>                is_large_pte(*sptep)? "2MB" : "4kB",
>                *sptep & PT_PRESENT_MASK ?"RW":"R", gfn,
>                *sptep, sptep);
> -     if (!was_rmapped && is_large_pte(*sptep))
> -             ++vcpu->kvm->stat.lpages;
> -
> -     if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep)) {
> -             if (!was_rmapped) {
> -                     rmap_count = rmap_add(vcpu, sptep, gfn);
> -                     if (rmap_count > RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD)
> -                             rmap_recycle(vcpu, sptep, gfn);
> -             }
> -     }
>  
>       kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>  }
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to