On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 17:03 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 3 September 2013 16:58, Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I was under the impression that we were only ever updating linux-headers > > from mainline, never from kvm-next. > > Looking at the git history, it's variable. Four of the > last 10 updates were from somewhere other than mainline. > In any case this is the kind of policy decision that > means updates should go via the QEMU KVM maintainers :-)
Seems like every update except ppc has come from mainline. Personally, I don't think it makes sense anymore. QEMU has scope beyond KVM and it makes about as much sense to snapshot kvm.git as it does to snapshot my vfio next branch or Michael's virtio queue. If we only pull from mainline we never have to worry about regressing something that isn't actually upstream yet. Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
