Il 16/12/2013 12:55, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
> It's a pathological case, but still a valid one: If L1 disables APIC
> virtualization and also allows L2 to directly write to the APIC page, we
> have to forcibly enable APIC virtualization while in L2 if the in-kernel
> APIC is in use.
> 
> This allows to run the direct interrupt test case in the vmx unit test
> without x2APIC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index da04247..7c3ea63 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -7771,6 +7771,11 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
>                       else
>                               vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR,
>                                 page_to_phys(vmx->nested.apic_access_page));
> +             } else if (vm_need_virtualize_apic_accesses(vmx->vcpu.kvm)) {
> +                     exec_control |=
> +                             SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
> +                     vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR,
> +                             page_to_phys(vcpu->kvm->arch.apic_access_page));
>               }
>  
>               vmcs_write32(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, exec_control);
> 

Applied, thanks.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to