On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 17:07 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:34:46PM +0000, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > VFIO supports pass-through of devices to user space - for sake
> > of illustration, say a PCI e1000 device:
> > 
> > - the e1000 is first unbound from the PCI e1000 driver via sysfs
> > - the vfio-pci driver is told via new_id that it now handles e1000 devices
> > - the e1000 is explicitly bound to vfio-pci through sysfs
> > 
> > However, now we have two drivers in the system that both handle e1000
> > devices.  A hotplug event could then occur and it is ambiguous as to which
> > driver will claim the device.  The desired semantics is that vfio-pci is
> > only bound to devices by explicit request in sysfs.  This patch makes this
> > possible by introducing a sysfs_bind_only flag in struct device_driver.
> 
> Why deal with this at all and not just deal with the "bind" sysfs file
> instead?  That way no driver core logic needs to be changed at all, and
> your userspace tools know _exactly_ which device is being bound to the
> new device.
> 
> Don't mess with the "new_id" file for stuff like this, as you point out,
> it's "tricky"...

As discussed before, "bind" does not bypass the ID checks, and thus it
does not work without either "new_id" or a wildcard match.

Or are you proposing changing "bind" so that it does bypass the ID
checks?  Or perhaps a new "force_bind" file that does?

-Scott


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to