On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:51:57 +0100 Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> kvm_rebooting is referenced from assembler code, thus > needs to be visible. So I read the gcc page and looked at the __visible definition but I still don't really get it. What goes wrong if the __visible isn't present on these referenced-from-asm identifiers? > Cc: g...@redhat.com > Cc: pbonz...@redhat.com Grumble. Email addresses go into commits with display names and <>. At least, 89.3% of them do. Some sucker has to go through these and fix them up. I'd prefer it not be me ;) > > ... > > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static void kvm_release_pfn_dirty(pfn_t pfn); > static void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm, > struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, gfn_t gfn); > > -bool kvm_rebooting; > +__visible bool kvm_rebooting; > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_rebooting); > > static bool largepages_enabled = true; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
