Hi! > > Why? The v2m device isn't really related to the GICv3... > In the future this handle could point to GICv2m or GICv3 ITS or GICv3 > (if I understand it correctly, when it supports message base interrupts > and no ITS). They all would play the same role of msi-controller.
Yes, exactly. In my implementation being developed i actually reused first patch from this set, and indeed 'v2m_handle' appeared to be useful for ITS. My code flow is something like: if (gicv3) create_its() else create_v2m() Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
