On 2016/4/4 19:37, Julien Grall wrote:
Fill up the recently introduced gic_kvm_info with the hardware
information used for virtualization.

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>

---
     Changes in v5:
         - Remove the alignment check for GICV. It's already done in the
         KVM code.
         - Fix initialization of KVM with ACPI.

     Changes in v4:
         - Change the flow to call gic_kvm_set_info only when all the
         mandatory information are valid.
         - Remove unecessary code in ACPI parsing (the virtual control
         interface doesn't exist for GICv3).
         - Rework commit message
         - Rework the ACPI support as it didn't collect hardware info for
         virtualization when there is more than 1 redistributor region

     Changes in v3:
         - Add ACPI support

     Changes in v2:
         - Use 0 rather than a negative value to know when the maintenance IRQ
         is not present.
         - Use resource for vcpu and vctrl
---
  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c           | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h |   1 +
  2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 50e87e6..08afbfe 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
  #include <linux/slab.h>

  #include <linux/irqchip.h>
+#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h>
  #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>

  #include <asm/cputype.h>
@@ -56,6 +57,8 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
  static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly;
  static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE;

+static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v3_kvm_info;
+
  #define gic_data_rdist()              (this_cpu_ptr(gic_data.rdists.rdist))
  #define gic_data_rdist_rd_base()      (gic_data_rdist()->rd_base)
  #define gic_data_rdist_sgi_base()     (gic_data_rdist_rd_base() + SZ_64K)
@@ -901,6 +904,30 @@ static int __init gic_validate_dist_version(void __iomem 
*dist_base)
        return 0;
  }

+static void __init gic_of_setup_kvm_info(struct device_node *node)
+{
+       int ret;
+       struct resource r;
+       u32 gicv_idx;
+
+       gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3;
+
+       gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
+       if (!gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq)
+               return;
+
+       if (of_property_read_u32(node, "#redistributor-regions",
+                                &gicv_idx))
+               gicv_idx = 1;
+
+       gicv_idx += 3;  /* Also skip GICD, GICC, GICH */
+       ret = of_address_to_resource(node, gicv_idx, &r);
+       if (!ret)
+               gic_v3_kvm_info.vcpu = r;
+
+       gic_set_kvm_info(&gic_v3_kvm_info);
+}
+
  static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node 
*parent)
  {
        void __iomem *dist_base;
@@ -952,8 +979,10 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, 
struct device_node *pare

        err = gic_init_bases(dist_base, rdist_regs, nr_redist_regions,
                             redist_stride, &node->fwnode);
-       if (!err)
+       if (!err) {
+               gic_of_setup_kvm_info(node);
                return 0;
+       }

  out_unmap_rdist:
        for (i = 0; i < nr_redist_regions; i++)
@@ -974,6 +1003,9 @@ static struct
        struct redist_region *redist_regs;
        u32 nr_redist_regions;
        bool single_redist;
+       u32 maint_irq;
+       int maint_irq_mode;
+       phys_addr_t vcpu_base;
  } acpi_data __initdata;

  static void __init
@@ -1110,7 +1142,81 @@ static bool __init acpi_validate_gic_table(struct 
acpi_subtable_header *header,
        return true;
  }

+static int __init gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc(struct acpi_subtable_header 
*header,
+                                               const unsigned long end)
+{
+       struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc =
+               (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header;
+       int maint_irq_mode;
+       static int first_madt = true;
+
+       maint_irq_mode = (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_VGIC_IRQ_MODE) ?
+               ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE : ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;
+
+       if (first_madt) {
+               first_madt = false;
+
+               acpi_data.maint_irq = gicc->vgic_interrupt;
+               acpi_data.maint_irq_mode = maint_irq_mode;
+               acpi_data.vcpu_base = gicc->gicv_base_address;
+
+               return 0;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * The maintenance interrupt and GICV should be the same for every CPU
+        */
+       if ((acpi_data.maint_irq != gicc->vgic_interrupt) ||
+           (acpi_data.maint_irq_mode != maint_irq_mode) ||
+           (acpi_data.vcpu_base != gicc->gicv_base_address))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static bool __init gic_acpi_collect_virt_info(void)
+{
+       int count;
+
+       count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT,
+                                     gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc, 0);
+
+       return (count > 0);
+}
+
  #define ACPI_GICV3_DIST_MEM_SIZE (SZ_64K)
+#define ACPI_GICV2_VCTRL_MEM_SIZE      (SZ_4K)
+#define ACPI_GICV2_VCPU_MEM_SIZE       (SZ_8K)
+
+static void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void)
+{
+       int irq;
+
+       if (!gic_acpi_collect_virt_info()) {
+               pr_warn("Unable to get hardware information used for 
virtualization\n");
+               return;
+       }
+
+       gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3;
+
+       irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, acpi_data.maint_irq,
+                               acpi_data.maint_irq_mode,
+                               ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH);
+       if (irq <= 0)
+               return;
+
+       gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq;
+
+       if (acpi_data.vcpu_base) {

Sorry, I'm not familiar with KVM, but I got a question here, will
KVM works without valid vcpu_base in GICv3 mode?

Thanks
Hanjun
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to