On 14/03/17 16:05, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:24:33PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> As noticed by RMK in this thread[1], the hyp-stub API on 32bit ARM
>> could do with some TLC (it cannot perform a soft-restart at HYP, and
>> has holes in the hyp-stub support in a number of places). In general,
>> it would be desirable for the 32bit behaviour to align on 64bit, if
>> only to ease maintenance.
>
> What's the merge plan for this?
If you're happy with it (together with Christoffer, Will and Catalin), I
plat to take it through the kvmarm tree.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
