Hi Marc, On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 07:37:33PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > As noticed by RMK in this thread[1], the hyp-stub API on 32bit ARM > could do with some TLC (it cannot perform a soft-restart at HYP, and > has holes in the hyp-stub support in a number of places). In general, > it would be desirable for the 32bit behaviour to align on 64bit, if > only to ease maintenance. > > This series implements the following: > - Add HVC_[GS]ET_VECTORS and HVC_SOFT_RESTART to the 32bit code > - Add HVC_RESET_VECTORS to both arm and arm64, removing the need for > __hyp_reset_vectors > - Implement add the stub entry points in the KVM init code, which > didn't implement any so far > - Convert the HYP code to use the init code stubs directly > - Some general cleanup as a result of these changes (which includes > killing HVC_GET_VECTORS) > - Add some API documentation that covers the above > > Patches 14 to 16 would be better squashed into 12 and 13, but I've > kept them separate so that I can take the blame for everything I've > broken. > > I've tested this on arm (Cubietruck, Jetson TK1) and arm64 (Seattle), > both as host and guest. Keerthy has been kind enough to test the 32bit > code on DRA7-EVM, AM57XX-EVM and KEYSTONE-K2E-EVM. > > [1] > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-December/473472.html > > * From v4: > - Added a standard return value on stub hypercall failure > - Zero r0/x0 on successful hypercall > - Make 32bit ARM resistant to kvm_reboot while executing a guest > - Update documentation to reflect the calling convention expectations > - Added Acks from Catalin > - Rebased on 4.11-rc5
Thanks for doing the changes. I have applied your patches to kvmarm/queue. -Christoffer _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm