On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:15:21PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> We plan to support different migration ABIs, ie. characterizing
> the ITS table layout format in guest RAM. Typically a new ABI will

nit: s/Typically/For example,

> be needed if vLPIs get supported for nested use case.
> 
> So let's introduce an array of supported ABIs (at the moment a single
> ABI is supported though). The following characteristics are foreseen
> to vary with the ABI: size of table entries, save/restore operation.
> 
> By default the MAX_ABI_REV is applied on its creation. In subsequent
> patches we will introduce a way for the userspace to change the ABI
> in use.
> 
> The entry sizes now are set according to the ABI version and not
> hardcoded anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v5: creation and squash KVM: arm64: ITS: Report the ITE size in
>     GITS_TYPER
> ---
>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h             |  3 ++
>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h |  4 ++
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c       | 82 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index c0b3d99..285474a 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ struct vgic_its {
>       u32                     creadr;
>       u32                     cwriter;
>  
> +     /* migration ABI revision in use */
> +     u32                     abi_rev;
> +
>       /* Protects the device and collection lists */
>       struct mutex            its_lock;
>       struct list_head        device_list;
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h 
> b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> index 97cbca1..9648bad 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> @@ -132,6 +132,8 @@
>  #define GIC_BASER_SHAREABILITY(reg, type)                            \
>       (GIC_BASER_##type << reg##_SHAREABILITY_SHIFT)
>  
> +#define GIC_ENCODE_SZ(n, w) (((unsigned long)(n) - 1) & GENMASK_ULL(((w) - 
> 1), 0))
> +

This is a very generic name.  Could you add a comment about what the
idea is?

>  #define GICR_PROPBASER_SHAREABILITY_SHIFT            (10)
>  #define GICR_PROPBASER_INNER_CACHEABILITY_SHIFT              (7)
>  #define GICR_PROPBASER_OUTER_CACHEABILITY_SHIFT              (56)
> @@ -232,6 +234,7 @@
>  #define GITS_CTLR_QUIESCENT          (1U << 31)
>  
>  #define GITS_TYPER_PLPIS             (1UL << 0)
> +#define GITS_TYPER_ITT_ENTRY_SIZE_SHIFT      4
>  #define GITS_TYPER_IDBITS_SHIFT              8
>  #define GITS_TYPER_DEVBITS_SHIFT     13
>  #define GITS_TYPER_DEVBITS(r)                ((((r) >> 
> GITS_TYPER_DEVBITS_SHIFT) & 0x1f) + 1)
> @@ -290,6 +293,7 @@
>  #define GITS_BASER_TYPE(r)           (((r) >> GITS_BASER_TYPE_SHIFT) & 7)
>  #define GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE_SHIFT          (48)
>  #define GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE(r)     ((((r) >> GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE_SHIFT) 
> & 0x1f) + 1)
> +#define GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE_MASK   GENMASK_ULL(52, 48)
>  #define GITS_BASER_SHAREABILITY_SHIFT        (10)
>  #define GITS_BASER_InnerShareable                                    \
>       GIC_BASER_SHAREABILITY(GITS_BASER, InnerShareable)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 79ed1c2..69ecfe4 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,12 @@
>  #include "vgic.h"
>  #include "vgic-mmio.h"
>  
> +/* Highest migration ABI revision supported by this code */
> +#define MAX_ABI_REV 0
> +
> +static int vgic_its_set_abi(struct vgic_its *its, int rev);
> +static const struct vgic_its_abi *vgic_its_get_abi(struct vgic_its *its);
> +
>  /*
>   * Creates a new (reference to a) struct vgic_irq for a given LPI.
>   * If this LPI is already mapped on another ITS, we increase its refcount
> @@ -123,6 +129,15 @@ struct its_ite {
>       u32 event_id;
>  };
>  
> +struct vgic_its_abi {
> +     int cte_esz;
> +     int dte_esz;
> +     int ite_esz;
> +     int (*save_tables)(struct vgic_its *its);
> +     int (*restore_tables)(struct vgic_its *its);
> +     int (*commit)(struct vgic_its *its);

Can you document what these functions do (especially the commit function
seems to be internal and not be related to the ABI as such).

> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * Find and returns a device in the device table for an ITS.
>   * Must be called with the its_lock mutex held.
> @@ -364,6 +379,7 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_its_typer(struct kvm 
> *kvm,
>                                             struct vgic_its *its,
>                                             gpa_t addr, unsigned int len)
>  {
> +     const struct vgic_its_abi *abi = vgic_its_get_abi(its);
>       u64 reg = GITS_TYPER_PLPIS;
>  
>       /*
> @@ -376,6 +392,7 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_its_typer(struct kvm 
> *kvm,
>        */
>       reg |= 0x0f << GITS_TYPER_DEVBITS_SHIFT;
>       reg |= 0x0f << GITS_TYPER_IDBITS_SHIFT;
> +     reg |= GIC_ENCODE_SZ(abi->ite_esz, 4) << 
> GITS_TYPER_ITT_ENTRY_SIZE_SHIFT;
>  
>       return extract_bytes(reg, addr & 7, len);
>  }
> @@ -1268,6 +1285,7 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm,
>                                     gpa_t addr, unsigned int len,
>                                     unsigned long val)
>  {
> +     const struct vgic_its_abi *abi = vgic_its_get_abi(its);
>       u64 entry_size, device_type;
>       u64 reg, *regptr, clearbits = 0;
>  
> @@ -1278,12 +1296,12 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm,
>       switch (BASER_INDEX(addr)) {
>       case 0:
>               regptr = &its->baser_device_table;
> -             entry_size = 8;
> +             entry_size = abi->dte_esz;
>               device_type = GITS_BASER_TYPE_DEVICE;
>               break;
>       case 1:
>               regptr = &its->baser_coll_table;
> -             entry_size = 8;
> +             entry_size = abi->cte_esz;
>               device_type = GITS_BASER_TYPE_COLLECTION;
>               clearbits = GITS_BASER_INDIRECT;
>               break;
> @@ -1425,7 +1443,6 @@ static int vgic_register_its_iodev(struct kvm *kvm, 
> struct vgic_its *its)
>       (GIC_BASER_CACHEABILITY(GITS_BASER, INNER, RaWb)                | \
>        GIC_BASER_CACHEABILITY(GITS_BASER, OUTER, SameAsInner)         | \
>        GIC_BASER_SHAREABILITY(GITS_BASER, InnerShareable)             | \
> -      ((8ULL - 1) << GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE_SHIFT)                    | \
>        GITS_BASER_PAGE_SIZE_64K)
>  
>  #define INITIAL_PROPBASER_VALUE                                              
>   \
> @@ -1465,7 +1482,7 @@ static int vgic_its_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 
> type)
>  
>       dev->private = its;
>  
> -     return 0;
> +     return vgic_its_set_abi(its, MAX_ABI_REV);
>  }
>  
>  static void vgic_its_destroy(struct kvm_device *kvm_dev)
> @@ -1592,6 +1609,63 @@ int vgic_its_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * vgic_its_save_tables_v0 - Save the ITS tables into guest ARM
> + * according to v0 ABI
> + */
> +static int vgic_its_save_tables_v0(struct vgic_its *its)
> +{
> +     return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vgic_its_restore_tables_v0 - Restore the ITS tables from guest RAM
> + * to internal data structs according to V0 ABI
> + *
> + */
> +static int vgic_its_restore_tables_v0(struct vgic_its *its)
> +{
> +     return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +static int vgic_its_commit_v0(struct vgic_its *its)
> +{
> +     const struct vgic_its_abi *abi;
> +
> +     abi = vgic_its_get_abi(its);
> +     its->baser_coll_table &= ~GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE_MASK;
> +     its->baser_device_table &= ~GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE_MASK;
> +
> +     its->baser_coll_table |= (GIC_ENCODE_SZ(abi->cte_esz, 5)
> +                                     << GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE_SHIFT);
> +
> +     its->baser_device_table |= (GIC_ENCODE_SZ(abi->dte_esz, 5)
> +                                     << GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE_SHIFT);
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct vgic_its_abi abi[MAX_ABI_REV + 1] = {

nit: can we name this its_table_abi_versions or something like that
which is slightly more descriptive?

> +     {.cte_esz = 8, .dte_esz = 8, .ite_esz = 8,
> +      .save_tables = vgic_its_save_tables_v0,
> +      .restore_tables = vgic_its_restore_tables_v0,
> +      . commit = vgic_its_commit_v0,

stray whitespace

> +     },
> +};
> +
> +inline const struct vgic_its_abi *vgic_its_get_abi(struct vgic_its *its)
> +{
> +     return &abi[its->abi_rev];
> +}
> +
> +int vgic_its_set_abi(struct vgic_its *its, int rev)
> +{
> +     const struct vgic_its_abi *abi;
> +
> +     its->abi_rev = rev;
> +     abi = vgic_its_get_abi(its);
> +     return abi->commit(its);
> +}
> +
>  static int vgic_its_has_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
>                            struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.5.5
> 

Thanks,
-Christoffer
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to