On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:10:02AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> The spec says it is UNPREDICTABLE to enable the ITS
> if any of the following conditions are true:
> 
> - GITS_CBASER.Valid == 0.
> - GITS_BASER<n>.Valid == 0, for any GITS_BASER<n> register
>   where the Type field indicates Device.
> - GITS_BASER<n>.Valid == 0, for any GITS_BASER<n> register
>   where the Type field indicates Interrupt Collection and
>   GITS_TYPER.HCC == 0.
> 
> In that case, let's keep the ITS disabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v3: creation
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index e59363e..e61736b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -1488,6 +1488,16 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_ctlr(struct kvm *kvm, 
> struct vgic_its *its,
>       its->enabled = !!(val & GITS_CTLR_ENABLE);
>  
>       /*
> +      * It is UNPREDICTABLE to enable the ITS if any of the CBASER or
> +      * device/collection BASER are invalid
> +      */
> +     if (its->enabled &&
> +             (!(its->baser_device_table & GITS_BASER_VALID) ||
> +              !(its->baser_coll_table & GITS_BASER_VALID) ||
> +              !(its->cbaser && GITS_CBASER_VALID)))

whoops, you wanted &, not && in the last one I think.

> +             its->enabled = false;
> +
> +     /*
>        * Try to process any pending commands. This function bails out early
>        * if the ITS is disabled or no commands have been queued.
>        */
> -- 
> 2.5.5
> 
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to