On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 09:13:08PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 01:30:39PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > Before we add more common code to the wfi emulation, let's first
> > factor out everything common.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> > arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c | 14 +++++---------
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> > arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 14 +++++---------
> > virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > virt/kvm/arm/psci.c | 15 +++++++--------
> > 6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 85f3c20b9759..964320825372 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -231,6 +231,8 @@ void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_on(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > void kvm_arm_halt_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
> > void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
> > +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >
> > int kvm_arm_copy_coproc_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user
> > *uindices);
> > unsigned long kvm_arm_num_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > index cf8bf6bf87c4..e40466577c87 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > @@ -57,22 +57,18 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
> > kvm_run *run)
> > * @run: the kvm_run structure pointer
> > *
> > * WFE: Yield the CPU and come back to this vcpu when the scheduler
> > - * decides to.
> > - * WFI: Simply call kvm_vcpu_block(), which will halt execution of
> > - * world-switches and schedule other host processes until there is an
> > - * incoming IRQ or FIQ to the VM.
> > + * decides to.
> > + * WFI: Halt execution of world-switches and schedule other host
> > + * processes until there is an incoming IRQ or FIQ to the VM.
>
> s/VM/VCPU/
>
> > */
> > static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> > {
> > if (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & HSR_WFI_IS_WFE) {
> > trace_kvm_wfx(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), true);
> > - vcpu->stat.wfe_exit_stat++;
> > - kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu));
> > + kvm_arm_emulate_wfe(vcpu);
> > } else {
> > trace_kvm_wfx(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), false);
> > - vcpu->stat.wfi_exit_stat++;
> > - kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> > - kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
> > + kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(vcpu);
> > }
> >
> > kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 25545a87de11..a774f6b30474 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_on(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > void kvm_arm_halt_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
> > void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
> > +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >
> > u64 __kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...);
> > #define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...) __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > index 7debb74843a0..7ba50a296d10 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > @@ -74,22 +74,18 @@ static int handle_no_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct kvm_run *run)
> > * @vcpu: the vcpu pointer
> > *
> > * WFE: Yield the CPU and come back to this vcpu when the scheduler
> > - * decides to.
> > - * WFI: Simply call kvm_vcpu_block(), which will halt execution of
> > - * world-switches and schedule other host processes until there is an
> > - * incoming IRQ or FIQ to the VM.
> > + * decides to.
> > + * WFI: Halt execution of world-switches and schedule other host
> > + * processes until there is an incoming IRQ or FIQ to the VM.
> > */
> > static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> > {
> > if (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE) {
> > trace_kvm_wfx_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), true);
> > - vcpu->stat.wfe_exit_stat++;
> > - kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu));
> > + kvm_arm_emulate_wfe(vcpu);
> > } else {
> > trace_kvm_wfx_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), false);
> > - vcpu->stat.wfi_exit_stat++;
> > - kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> > - kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
> > + kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(vcpu);
> > }
> >
> > kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> > index 954e77608d29..220a3dbda76c 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> > @@ -573,6 +573,19 @@ void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + vcpu->stat.wfe_exit_stat++;
> > + kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu));
> > +}
> > +
> > +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + vcpu->stat.wfi_exit_stat++;
> > + kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> > + kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void vcpu_req_sleep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > struct swait_queue_head *wq = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> > index a7bf152f1247..755c415304ea 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> > @@ -50,20 +50,19 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_suspend(struct
> > kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > * This means for KVM the wakeup events are interrupts and
> > * this is consistent with intended use of StateID as described
> > * in section 5.4.1 of PSCI v0.2 specification (ARM DEN 0022A).
> > - *
> > - * Further, we also treat power-down request to be same as
> > - * stand-by request as-per section 5.4.2 clause 3 of PSCI v0.2
> > - * specification (ARM DEN 0022A). This means all suspend states
> > - * for KVM will preserve the register state.
> > */
> > - kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> > - kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
> > -
> > + kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(vcpu);
> > return PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
> > }
> >
> > static void kvm_psci_vcpu_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > + /*
> > + * We treat a power-off request the same as a stand-by request,
> > + * as-per section 5.4.2 clause 3 of PSCI v0.2* specification
> > + * (ARM DEN 0022A). This means all suspend states for KVM will
> > + * preserve the register state.
> > + */
>
> I'm not actually convinced that this part of the comment was about
> power-off. I think what it was trying to say was simply that a suspend
> operation should preverse the register state, and therefore the
> commentary doesn't belong in this function. I agree that the comment is
> potentially more confusing (I lost the exact version of the document
> referred to in the original comment so can't be sure if there was
> something unclear in the original document or if the comment is just
> vaguely written), than it helps. Therefore, I think you should either
> (a) keep the comment as it is, (b) rewrite it to make sense, or (c) just
> delete it.
I can't find version A either. I read over C just now to try and think of
a way to improve the comment, but I wasn't overly enlightened, so I'll
probably just opt to remove it.
>
> > kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.13.5
> >
>
> Thanks,
> -Christoffer
Thanks,
drew
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
