On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:41:21PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> There's a semantic difference between the EL1 registers that control
> operation of a kernel running in EL1 and EL1 registers that only control
> userspace execution in EL0.  Since we can defer saving/restoring the
> latter, move them into their own function.
> 
> We also take this chance to rename the function saving/restoring the
> remaining system register to make it clear this function deals with
> the EL1 system registers.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> index c4a3714..193c2b0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> @@ -34,14 +34,18 @@ static void __hyp_text __sysreg_do_nothing(struct 
> kvm_cpu_context *ctxt) { }
>  
>  static void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_common_state(struct kvm_cpu_context 
> *ctxt)
>  {
> +     ctxt->sys_regs[MDSCR_EL1]       = read_sysreg(mdscr_el1);
> +     ctxt->gp_regs.regs.sp           = read_sysreg(sp_el0);

Maybe a comment stating that sp_el0 is here, instead of down in user
state, because arm64 Linux chooses to use it for the 'current' pointer.
At least that's why I think it's been promoted to common state, but maybe
there was a different reason I missed.

> +}
> +
> +static void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_user_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> +{
>       ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1]       = read_sysreg(actlr_el1);
>       ctxt->sys_regs[TPIDR_EL0]       = read_sysreg(tpidr_el0);
>       ctxt->sys_regs[TPIDRRO_EL0]     = read_sysreg(tpidrro_el0);
> -     ctxt->sys_regs[MDSCR_EL1]       = read_sysreg(mdscr_el1);
> -     ctxt->gp_regs.regs.sp           = read_sysreg(sp_el0);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  {
>       ctxt->sys_regs[MPIDR_EL1]       = read_sysreg(vmpidr_el2);
>       ctxt->sys_regs[CSSELR_EL1]      = read_sysreg(csselr_el1);
> @@ -70,31 +74,37 @@ static void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_state(struct 
> kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  }
>  
>  static hyp_alternate_select(__sysreg_call_save_host_state,
> -                         __sysreg_save_state, __sysreg_do_nothing,
> +                         __sysreg_save_el1_state, __sysreg_do_nothing,
>                           ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
>  
>  void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_host_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  {
>       __sysreg_call_save_host_state()(ctxt);
>       __sysreg_save_common_state(ctxt);
> +     __sysreg_save_user_state(ctxt);
>  }
>  
>  void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_guest_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  {
> -     __sysreg_save_state(ctxt);
> +     __sysreg_save_el1_state(ctxt);
>       __sysreg_save_common_state(ctxt);
> +     __sysreg_save_user_state(ctxt);
>  }
>  
>  static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_common_state(struct kvm_cpu_context 
> *ctxt)
>  {
> -     write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1],   actlr_el1);
> -     write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[TPIDR_EL0],   tpidr_el0);
> -     write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[TPIDRRO_EL0], tpidrro_el0);
>       write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[MDSCR_EL1],   mdscr_el1);
>       write_sysreg(ctxt->gp_regs.regs.sp,       sp_el0);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_user_state(struct kvm_cpu_context 
> *ctxt)
> +{
> +     write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1],         actlr_el1);
> +     write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[TPIDR_EL0],         tpidr_el0);
> +     write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[TPIDRRO_EL0],       tpidrro_el0);
> +}
> +
> +static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context 
> *ctxt)
>  {
>       write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[MPIDR_EL1],         vmpidr_el2);
>       write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[CSSELR_EL1],        csselr_el1);
> @@ -123,19 +133,21 @@ static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_state(struct 
> kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  }
>  
>  static hyp_alternate_select(__sysreg_call_restore_host_state,
> -                         __sysreg_restore_state, __sysreg_do_nothing,
> +                         __sysreg_restore_el1_state, __sysreg_do_nothing,
>                           ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
>  
>  void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_host_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  {
>       __sysreg_call_restore_host_state()(ctxt);
>       __sysreg_restore_common_state(ctxt);
> +     __sysreg_restore_user_state(ctxt);
>  }
>  
>  void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_guest_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  {
> -     __sysreg_restore_state(ctxt);
> +     __sysreg_restore_el1_state(ctxt);
>       __sysreg_restore_common_state(ctxt);
> +     __sysreg_restore_user_state(ctxt);
>  }
>  
>  static void __hyp_text __fpsimd32_save_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> -- 
> 2.9.0
>

Otherwise
 
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to