From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
The way we call kvm_vgic_destroy is a bit bizarre. We call it
*after* having freed the vcpus, which sort of defeats the point
of cleaning up things before that point.
Let's move kvm_vgic_destroy towards the beginning of kvm_arch_destroy_vm,
which seems more sensible.
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cd...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@linaro.org>
---
virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 79f8ddd604c1..e1e947fe9bc2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
{
int i;
+ kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
+
free_percpu(kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran);
kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran = NULL;
@@ -186,8 +188,6 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm->vcpus[i] = NULL;
}
}
-
- kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
}
int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
--
2.14.2
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
