From: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy already gets called from kvm_vgic_destroy for
each vcpu, so we don't have to call it from kvm_arch_vcpu_free.
Additionally the other architectures set kvm->online_vcpus to zero
after freeing them. We might as well do that for ARM too.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@linaro.org>
---
virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index ca65d06b38a8..675844c2174a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm->vcpus[i] = NULL;
}
}
+ atomic_set(&kvm->online_vcpus, 0);
}
int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
@@ -296,7 +297,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
kvm_mmu_free_memory_caches(vcpu);
kvm_timer_vcpu_terminate(vcpu);
- kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(vcpu);
kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(vcpu);
kvm_vcpu_uninit(vcpu);
kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vcpu);
--
2.14.2
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
