On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:03:12PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote: > The comment only applied to SPE on non-VHE systems, so we simply remove > it. > > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c > index 717c8f5c6be7..a99224996e33 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c > @@ -410,10 +410,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > __fpsimd_restore_state(&host_ctxt->gp_regs.fp_regs); > } > > - /* > - * This must come after restoring the host sysregs, since a non-VHE > - * system may enable SPE here and make use of the TTBRs. > - */ > __debug_switch_to_host(vcpu); > > return exit_code; > -- > 2.14.2 >
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
