On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:38:16AM -0400, Tyler Baicar wrote: > I haven't seen a deadlock from that, but it looks possible. What if > the ghes_proc() call in ghes_probe() is moved before the second switch > statement? That way it is before the NMI/IRQ/poll is setup. At quick > glance I think that should avoid the deadlock and still provide the > functionality that call was added for. I can test that out if you all > agree.
Makes sense but please audit it properly before doing the change. That code is full of landmines and could use a proper scrubbing first. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm