On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:38:16AM -0400, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> I haven't seen a deadlock from that, but it looks possible. What if
> the ghes_proc() call in ghes_probe() is moved before the second switch
> statement? That way it is before the NMI/IRQ/poll is setup. At quick
> glance I think that should avoid the deadlock and still provide the
> functionality that call was added for. I can test that out if you all
> agree.
Makes sense but please audit it properly before doing the change. That
code is full of landmines and could use a proper scrubbing first.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
