We've so far used the PSCI return codes for SMCCC because they
were extremely similar. But with the new ARM DEN 0070A specification,
"NOT_REQUIRED" (-2) is clashing with PSCI's "PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS".

Let's bite the bullet and add SMCCC specific return codes. Users
can be repainted as and when required.

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
index a031897fca76..c89da86de99f 100644
--- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
+++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
@@ -291,5 +291,10 @@ asmlinkage void __arm_smccc_hvc(unsigned long a0, unsigned 
long a1,
  */
 #define arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(...) __arm_smccc_1_1(SMCCC_HVC_INST, __VA_ARGS__)
 
+/* Return codes defined in ARM DEN 0070A */
+#define SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS                      0
+#define SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED                        -1
+#define SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED                 -2
+
 #endif /*__ASSEMBLY__*/
 #endif /*__LINUX_ARM_SMCCC_H*/
-- 
2.14.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to