On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:31:19PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Contrary to the non-VHE version of the TLB invalidation helpers, the VHE
> code  has interrupts enabled, meaning that we can take an interrupt in
> the middle of such a sequence, and start running something else with
> HCR_EL2.TGE cleared.

Do we have to clear TGE to perform the TLB invalidation, or is that just
a side-effect of re-using code?

Also, do we generally perform TLB invalidations in the kernel with
interrupts disabled, or is this just a result of clearing TGE?

Somehow I feel like this should look more like just another TLB
invalidation in the kernel, but if there's a good reason why it can't
then this is fine.

Thanks,

    Christoffer

> 
> That's really not a good idea.
> 
> Take the heavy-handed option and disable interrupts in
> __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe, restoring them in __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe.
> The latter also gain an ISB in order to make sure that TGE really has
> taken effect.
> 
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> index 4dbd9c69a96d..7fcc9c1a5f45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> @@ -15,14 +15,19 @@
>   * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/irqflags.h>
> +
>  #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm *kvm)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> +                                              unsigned long *flags)
>  {
>       u64 val;
>  
> +     local_irq_save(*flags);
> +
>       /*
>        * With VHE enabled, we have HCR_EL2.{E2H,TGE} = {1,1}, and
>        * most TLB operations target EL2/EL0. In order to affect the
> @@ -37,7 +42,8 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm 
> *kvm)
>       isb();
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> +                                               unsigned long *flags)
>  {
>       __load_guest_stage2(kvm);
>       isb();
> @@ -48,7 +54,8 @@ static hyp_alternate_select(__tlb_switch_to_guest,
>                           __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe,
>                           ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm *kvm)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> +                                             unsigned long flags)
>  {
>       /*
>        * We're done with the TLB operation, let's restore the host's
> @@ -56,9 +63,12 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm 
> *kvm)
>        */
>       write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
>       write_sysreg(HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS, hcr_el2);
> +     isb();
> +     local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> +                                              unsigned long flags)
>  {
>       write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
>  }
> @@ -70,11 +80,13 @@ static hyp_alternate_select(__tlb_switch_to_host,
>  
>  void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
>  {
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +
>       dsb(ishst);
>  
>       /* Switch to requested VMID */
>       kvm = kern_hyp_va(kvm);
> -     __tlb_switch_to_guest()(kvm);
> +     __tlb_switch_to_guest()(kvm, &flags);
>  
>       /*
>        * We could do so much better if we had the VA as well.
> @@ -117,36 +129,39 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm 
> *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
>       if (!has_vhe() && icache_is_vpipt())
>               __flush_icache_all();
>  
> -     __tlb_switch_to_host()(kvm);
> +     __tlb_switch_to_host()(kvm, flags);
>  }
>  
>  void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +
>       dsb(ishst);
>  
>       /* Switch to requested VMID */
>       kvm = kern_hyp_va(kvm);
> -     __tlb_switch_to_guest()(kvm);
> +     __tlb_switch_to_guest()(kvm, &flags);
>  
>       __tlbi(vmalls12e1is);
>       dsb(ish);
>       isb();
>  
> -     __tlb_switch_to_host()(kvm);
> +     __tlb_switch_to_host()(kvm, flags);
>  }
>  
>  void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>       struct kvm *kvm = kern_hyp_va(kern_hyp_va(vcpu)->kvm);
> +     unsigned long flags;
>  
>       /* Switch to requested VMID */
> -     __tlb_switch_to_guest()(kvm);
> +     __tlb_switch_to_guest()(kvm, &flags);
>  
>       __tlbi(vmalle1);
>       dsb(nsh);
>       isb();
>  
> -     __tlb_switch_to_host()(kvm);
> +     __tlb_switch_to_host()(kvm, flags);
>  }
>  
>  void __hyp_text __kvm_flush_vm_context(void)
> -- 
> 2.19.2
> 
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to